Demonizing Sanskrit

Let us look at a passage written by Amir Khusro, a fourteenth century poet, praising the languages of our great country:

As I was born in Hind, I may be allowed to say a word respecting its languages. There is at this time in every province a language peculiar to itself, and not borrowed from any other—Sindi, Lahori, Kashmiri, the language of Dugar,” Dhur Samundar, Tilang, Gujarat, Ma’bar, Gaur, Bengal, Oudh, Dehli and its environs. These are all languages of Hind, which from ancient times have been applied in every way to the common purposes of life.

But there is another language more select than the others, which all the Brahmans use. Its name from of old is Sanskrit, and the common people know nothing of it. A Brahman knows it, but Brahmani women do not understand a word of it. It bears a resemblance to Arabic in some respects, in its permutations of letters, its grammar, its conjugations, and polish. They have four books in that language, which they are constantly in the habit of repeating. Their name is Bed. They contain stories of their gods, but little advantage can be derived from their perusal. Whatever other stories and fables they have, is contained in kabits, parwAnas, and namahs. The language possesses rules for composition and eloquence. The language is very precious, inferior to Arabic, but superior to Dari ; and though the latter is certainly sweet and melodious, yet even in that respect this language does not yield to it.

 Now compare it with the way it has been presented in the NCERT text book of class 7.

Page 10, Book - OUR PASTS - 2

Notice the differences?

Firstly, the sentence – 'These are all the languages of Hind' has been removed.

Secondly, the praise of Sanskrit has been omitted deliberately.

Why would you remove those words which re – inforce the unity and appreciation of our mother land? And why would anyone remove praise of Sanskrit?

The answer to both the questions is that the forces hostile to our country have been trying to discredit everything that has cultural and unifying value. And as the present textbooks indicate, these hateful forces are now infesting our democratic institutions to undermine them from within.

It is not that these forces were not there earlier. They have always been there.

In the year 1994, the minister of HRD, Arjun Singh, removed Sanskrit from the list of optional subjects for class XII of CBSE. Arjun Singh is remembered as the Congress Minister who was the first person to support Sonia Gandhi as Congress president. The reason given by him to remove Sanskrit, even as an elective subject, was that the Government did not have enough resources to teach Persian and Arabic.

The matter was challenged in the Supreme Court and the honorable court severely reprimanded the government move. In the stinging judgement, the court had a special mention about the significance of Sankrit. It reads:

Place of Sanskrit in our educational ethos.

11. It is well known that Sanskrit is a mother of all Indo-Aryan languages and it is this language in which our Vedas, Puranas and Upanishadas have been written and in which Kalidas, Bhavbuti, Banbhatta and Dandi wrote their classics. Teachings of Shankracharya, Ramanuj, Madhwacharya, Nimbark and Vallabhacharya would not have been woven into the fabric of Indian culture if Sanskrit would not have been available to them as a medium of expressing their thoughts.

12. The report of the Sanskrit Commission (set up by the Government of India) which was submitted in 1957 speaks eloquently about the importance of Sanskrit. We do not purpose to burden this judgment will all that was said by the Commission in this regard. It would be enough for our purpose if we take note of some passages finding place in the report which highlight the quality, substance, content and strength of Sanskrit. At page 71 of the report it has been mentioned that Sanskrit is one of the greatest languages of the world and it is the classical language par excellence not only of India but of a good part of Asia as well. At page 73 the report states that the Indian people and the Indian civilisation were born, so to say, in the lap of Sanskrit and it went "hand in hand with the historical development of the Indian people, and gave the noblest expression to their mind and culture which has come down to our day as an inheritance of priceless order for India, nay, for the entire world". The report further speaks at page 74 about the "great mental and spiritual link" of Sanskrit and of it being the elder sister of Greek and Latin, and cousin of English, French and Russian.

Again the the para 17, the court noted that:

We also propose to refer to what was said by the Sanskrit Commission on the subject of "Sanskrit and National Solidarity" in Chapter IV of its report. The Commission has, in this context first stated that Sanskrit is the "embodiment of Indian culture and civilisation". It then observes that the Indian People look upon Sanskrit as the binding force for the different peoples of this great country, which was described as the greatest discovery which, the Commission made as it travelled from Kerala to Kashmir and from Kamarupa to Saurastra. The Commission, while so travelling, found that though the people of this country differed in a number of ways, they all were proud to regard themselves as participants in a common heritage; and that heritage emphatically is the heritage of Sanskrit. According to the Commission one of the witnesses which appeared before it went to the length of suggesting that if the Sanskrit Commission had come before the States Reorganisation Commission, many of the recent bickerings in our national life could have been avoided. (Pages 80 and 81).

and then the SC concluded that

20. We, therefore, conclude by saying that in view of importance of Sanskrit for nurturing our cultural heritage, because of which even the official education policy has highlighted the need of study of Sanskrit, making of Sanskrit alone as an elective subject, while not conceding this status to Arabic and/or Persian, would not in any way militate against the basic tenet of secularism. There is thus no merit in the first objection raised by the Board.

21. In the aforesaid premises, we direct the Board to include Sanskrit as an elective subject in the syllabus under consideration. Necessary amendment in the syllabus shall be made within a period of three months from today.

A few years later, when Atal Bihari Vajpayee's government was formed, the HRD minister Murli Manohar Joshi was sympathetic to the cause of Sanskrit, therefore, the language survived in the curriculum.

But, the dirty tricks department was still working to attack the venerated language. According to India Express of 31/12/2000, one Kancha Illaiah of Hyderabad announced at India's national conference on Human rights that - “We want to kill Sanskrit”. 

 He claims to be a champion of Dalits and is frequently invited by American missionary organizations based Gospel for Asia and Dalit Freedom Network (DFN). In fact, he has been awarded a post doctoral fellowship by DFN. Funnily, his hatred does not stop at Sanskrit but he also advocates that the “IITs and IIMs should be shut down as they pander to the upper cast economy of the country”.

According to his article in Deccan Chronicle in 2013, Kancha considers Sonia Gandhi alongwith Annie Besant, Agnes Teresa, and Gail Omvedt to be four foreign women who have left a deep imprint on India. It is interesting to note that Kancha and Gail use the pseudo scientific racism which was used during colonial times by Britishers. His book titled 'Why I am not a Hindu' is is full of hatred againstHinduism and Brahmans. This book is sponsored by Rajiv Gandhi Foundation, headed by Sonia Gandhi. Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi, alongwith P Chidambaram are the members of executive committee of this foundation.

His vitriolic outburst did not bring any change in the NCERT policy at that time. The job to block Sanskrit was taken over by a woman called Aruna Roy. She filed a public interest litigation in the Supreme Court. She wanted the removal of Sanskrit from the list of subjects which students of India can study in schools. The argument put forward for this preposterous demand was that this was 'anti secular' and Sanskrit was being imposed on the students.

The SC had again to remind these 'activists' that:

For Sanskrit language being imposed, it has been pointed that allegation is wholly wrong. The provisions only enable this language to be taught to those students who wish to study it. Sanskrit may be made available as an additional option at the secondary stage and as suitable elective course to all those who wish to study it at the higher secondary stage. It is also pointed out that Sanskrit is one of the official languages of India. Reliance is placed on Santosh Kumar's case (Supra), wherein this Court has emphasized the importance of Sanskrit study and declared the omission of Sanskrit from CBSE syllabus as unjustified.

"19. .we entertain no doubt in our mind that teaching of Sanskrit alone as an elective subject can in no way be regarded as against secularism. Indeed, our Constitution requires giving of fillip to Sanskrit because of what has been stated in Article 351, in which while dealing with the duty of the Union to promote the spread of Hindi, it has been provided that it would draw, whenever necessary or desirable, for its vocabulary, primarily on Sanskrit. Encouragement to Sanskrit is also necessary because of it being one of the languages included in the Eighth Schedule.

20. We, therefore, conclude by saying that in view of importance of Sanskrit for nurturing our cultural heritage, because of which even the official education policy has highlighted the need of study of Sanskrit, making of Sanskrit alone as an elective subject, while not conceding this status to Arabic and/or Persian, would not in any way militate against the basic tenet of secularism. There is thus no merit in the first objection raised by the Board."

Although she did not get any success with the SC, but when the regime changed in 2004, she was inducted into an extra constitutional body called National Advisory Council, headed by Sonia Gandhi.

The change in regime also presented the chance to subvert NCERT from within. The example of distortion of Khusro's statement fits neatly into this pattern. In 2004, Arjun Singh was again gifted with the post of HRD Minister. Since then the status of Sanskrit has been gradually undermined. The more sinister attack on Sanskrit has been inserted into the history textbooks by revising them from 2005 - 2007.

All the symbols of our tradition and heritage are under a systematic attack, including Brahmans and holy scriptures. The terms and words have been strategically chosen to create a wrong perception. 

To ensure that the trickery is well established in the impressionable minds of the young children, there is a question placed on the next page asking the students about the statement of Khusro about the knowledge of Sanskrit.

Those who know a little bit of applied psychology know that the best form of propaganda is to let the victim think that it is his own thought and not a plant by someone. What other way to do it then by asking such mischievous questions!
Pay a closer attention to this page and you will find that Brahmans are being systematically maligned. In next issue, we will discuss the attack on Brahmans.

SLICING OFF SOUTH INDIA

Ever since the missionaries landed on the holy land of भारतवर्ष, They have been trying to slice off chunks of populations and land mass for converting the followers of सनातन धर्म into their own criminal creed.  One of the tools they employed was to portray that the idea of India as a nation state is a recent phenomenon and it never existed earlier. One sub plot of this devious plan is to show that the southern part of our country was never part of this consciousness and belongs to a different race, called Dravidian race (a term coined by missionary Caldwell). 

The NCERT goons of the present regime have picked up the thread from there under the tutelage of the Italian mafiosi. Take a look at this extract from the book of class 7. 

Take the term "Hindustan", for example. Today we understand it as "India", the modern nation – state. When the term was used in the thirteenth century by Minhaj – i – Siraj, a chronicler who wrote in Persian, he meant the areas of Punjab, Haryana and the lands between the Ganga and Yamuna. He used the term in a political sense for lands that were a part of the dominions of the Delhi Sultan. The areas included in this term shifted with the extent of the Sultanate but the term never included south India. By contrast, in the early sixteenth century Babur used Hindustan to describe the geography, the fauna and the culture of the inhabitants of the subcontinent. As we will see later in the chapter, this was somewhat similar to the way the fourteenth - century poet Amir Khusrau used the word "Hind". While the idea of a geographical and cultural entity like "India" did exist, the term "Hindustan" did not carry the political and national meanings which we assosiate with it today.

In short, South India was not a part of India. This is what the evangelists are using to create the North - South divide. 

Let us look at the facts.

Notice that the most famous chronicler 'Al - Beruni' is missing from the list.

The reason is that his description of India does not fit the agenda of the church. This is how Al - Beruni describes India

As to the orographic configuration of the inhabitable imagine a range of towering mountains like the vertebrae of a pine stretching through the middle latitude of the earth, and in longitude from east to west, passing through China, Tibet, the country of the Turks, Kabul, Badhakhshan, Tokharistan, Bamiyan, Elghor, Khurasan, Media, Adharbaijan, Armenia, the Roman Empire, the country of the Franks, and of the Jalalika (Gallicians). Long as this range is, it has also a considerable breadth, and, besides, many windings which enclose inhabited plains watered by streams which descend from the mountains both towards north and south. One of these plains is India, limited in the south by the above-mentioned Indian Ocean, and on all three other sides by the lofty mountains, the waters of which flow down to it.

The middle of India is the country round Kanoj, which they call Madhyadesa, i.e. the middle of the realms. It is the middle or centre from a geographical point of view, in so far as it lies half way between the sea and the mountains, in the midst between the hot and the cold provinces, and also between the eastern and western frontiers of India. But it is a political centre too, because in former times it was the residence of their most famous heroes and kings. The country of Sindh lies to the west of Kanoj. In marching from our country to Sindh we start from the country of Nimroz, i.e. the country of Sijistan, whilst marching to Hind or India proper we start from the side of Kabul. This, however, is not the only possible road. You may march into India from all sides, supposing that you can remove the obstacles in the way.

If still some doubts remain, they are dispelled by Al Beruni. He continues:

The southern frontier of India is formed by the southern ocean. The coast of India begins with Tiz, the capital of frontiers of Makran, and extends thence in a south-eastern direction towards the region of Al-daibal (देवालय was the first city fort of Sindh which was marauded by bigot called Muhammad bin Qasim) , over a distance of 40 farsakh. Between the two places lies the Gulf of Turan. A gulf is like an angle or a winding line of water penetrating from the ocean into the continent, and is dangerous for navigation, specially on account of ebb and flood. An estuary is something similar to a gulf, but is not formed by the ocean's penetrating into the continent. It is formed by an expanse of flowing water, which there is changed into standing water and is connected with the ocean. These estuaries, too, are dangerous for the ships, because the water is sweet and does not bear heavy bodies as well as salt water does. After the above-mentioned gulf follow the small Munha, the great Munha, then the Bawarij, i.e. the pirates of Kacch and Somanath. They are thus called because they commit their robberies on sea in ships called hira. The places on the coast are : Tawwalleshar, 50 farsakh from Debal ; Loharani, 12 farsakh; Baga, 12 farsakh; Kacch (कच्च), where the mukl-tree grows, and Baroi, 6 farsakh; Somanath (सोमनाथ), 14 farsakh; Kanbayat (खम्बात), 30 farsakli ; Asaivil, 2 days ; Bihroj, 30 farsakh (?) ; Sandan, 50 farsakh ; Subara, 6 farsakh ; Tana, 5 farsakh.

Thence the coast-line comes to the country Larm, in which lies the city of Jiniur, then to Vallabha, Kanji, Darvad (धारवाड़). Next follows a great bay in which Singaldib lies,  i.e. the island Sarandib (Ceylon श्रीलंका ). Round the bay lies the city of Panjaydvar (sic). When this city had fallen into ruins, the king, Jaur, built instead of it, on the coast towards the west, a new city which he called Padnar. The next place on the coast is Ummalnara, then Ramsher (रामेश्वरम) opposite Sarandib ; the distance of the sea between them is 12 farsakh. The distance from Panjayavar to Ramsher is 40 farsakh, that between Ramsher and Setubandha 2 farsakh. Setubandha means bridge of the ocean. It is the dike of Rama, the son of Dasaratha, which he built from the continent to the castle Lanka. At present it consists of isolated mountains between which the ocean flows. Sixteen farsakh from Setubandha towards the east is Kihkind (किश्किन्दा), the mountains of the monkeys.

There goes the missionary propaganda for a toss.

MUSLIMS SHOULD RETURN TO HINDUISM

Official historians of India are a funny lot. Read the following statement:

In theory, if Internet and information technology are not controlled by the state then those with access to them will claim to be free of the fear of becoming closed minds.

Ha!

Internet should be controlled by the state. Sounds like communist China??

You are not farther off the mark. Communist part is alright. The location is India. The gem comes from 'numero uno' of Marxist hisotrians, Romila Thapar.

Internet is the worst nightmare of all control freaks. That would mean Islamists, Missionaries and Commies. All the three hang out together at NCERT. Although they are arch enemies outside the borders of India but within they have joined hands to fight their common enemy - सनातन धर्म।

Those folks who have bought the bogey of 'All religions are same' or the foolish notion of 'सर्व धर्म सम भाव' are at a loss to understand the cause of hatred towards सनातन धर्म by the votaries of above mentioned three creeds. The reason is simple: The सनातन ideology is about freedom and meritocracy. It says if you are brainy then be a ब्राह्मण, if you are brawny then be a क्षत्रिय, If you have a penchant for worldly affairs be a वैश्य and if you want instructions from superiors then be a शूद्र । Every one has his own धर्म, called स्वधर्म। There is a wide corpus of literature to choose from and follow. Or even not to follow. No one will come to cut your throat.

On the other hand the three predatory creeds have the strange idea of one book which is to be revered. It is the basis of all actions of life. Those who do not follow this one book word for word are labeled as 'Infidels', 'Kaafirs' or 'Capitalists'. They have to be either converted or killed. The dictum is 'You are with us or you are with them'. Period.

That is why they are scared of सनातन धर्म। This sense of insecurity is not unfounded. These three creeds have thrived with the backing of violence and bloodshed, therefore they are giants with feet of clay. What happens to such giants can be seen in erstwhile Soviet Russia. They are bound to fall flat on their noses. It is just a matter of time. They resort to all kind of tactics. They fall to the level of brainwashing school going kids. Children who go to school with the thought that the persons appointed to teach them about the truth are being fooled by the fraudsters sitting at NCERT. 

 Read the adjoining extract carefully. They are supposedly teaching the Islamic concept of Zimmi to the school going children who do not suspect the authors of the book.

Jews and Christians lived under Muslim rulership. They paid a tax called Jizya and gained the right to be protected by Muslims. In Inda this status was extended to Hindus as well.

Look at the choice of words!!? The worst crook will blush at the blatant manner of these 'scholars'. 

status was extended to Hindus.

It seems as if it was some kind of a gift being handed over to Hindus. Like an olive branch. And Hindus should be grateful to the Muslims. Let us get a reality check.

The fact is that Muslim dacoits tried to kill all the Hindu men and take their women as sex slaves. But the Hindus with steel spine kept up the fight and resistance. Then the dacoits decided to let some of them live a life of abject surrender and poverty. One example will suffice.

When Allauddin Khilji was the chief Dacoit (Sultan is just a glorified word for these dacoits) in New Delhi, he sent for a Qazi named Mughisuddeen to find out how Hindus should be treated as per Islamic doctrine. When the Qazi came (The discussion, highlighted in blue has been taken from 'History of India as told by its own historian' Vol. 3 by Elliot and Dowson as translated from 'Tarikh e Firoz Shahi' pp 184-185)

The Sultan then asked, " How are Hindus designated in the law, as payers of tribute (Kharaj - guza) or givers of tribute {kharaj-dih) ?" The Kazi replied, "They are called payers of tribute, and when the revenue officer demands silver from them, they should, without question and with all humility and respect, tender gold. If the officer throws dirt into their mouths, they must without reluctance open their mouths wide to receive it. By doing so they show their respect for the officer. The due subordination of the zimmi (tribute-payer) is exhibited in this humble payment and by this throwing of dirt into their mouths. The glorification of Islam is a duty, and contempt of the Religion is vain. Allah holds them in contempt, for he says, 'Keep them under in subjection.' To keep the Hindus in abasement is especially a religious duty, because they are the most inveterate enemies of the Prophet, and because the Prophet has commanded us to slay them, plunder them, and make them captive, saying, ' Convert them to Islam or kill them, enslave them and spoil their wealth and property.' No doctor but the great doctor (Hanifa), to whose school we belong, has assented to the imposition of the jizya (poll tax) on Hindus. Doctors of other schools allow no other alternative but 'Death or Islam.'" 

Can there be anything more crooked then this?!!

Throw dirt into the mouth of Hindu and Hindu must submissively open his mouth?!! This is what NCERT says as 'status was extended to them'.
These were the oppressive conditions which सनातन धर्म has survived. The present day Muslims in India, Bangladesh and Pakistan are the off springs of such inhuman conditions which were levied on their forefathers. They have a right to know the circumstances which led to their conversions.
Let us get back to the discussion between Khilji and Qazi.

The Sultan smiled at this answer of the Kazi's, and said, "I do not understand any of the statements thou hast made ; Now you tell me that it is all in accordance with law that the Hindus should be reduced to the most abject obedience." Then the Sultan said, " Oh, doctor, thou art a learned man, but thou hast had no experience ; I am an unlettered man, but I have seen a great deal ; be assured then that the Hindus will never become submissive and obedient till they are reduced to poverty. I have, therefore, given orders that just sufficient shall be left to them from year to year, of corn, milk, and curds, but that they shall not be allowed to accumulate hoards and property."

It is these Hindus who would have felt the crushing weight of oppressive measures. Some of them would have accepted the Islamic creed for the well being of their family. The day this realization will sink into the Muslims (at least the intelligent ones), the shop if Mullahs will be shut down and the brazen liars like Zakir Naik will have to find a different job. 

Till then we have to keep putting forward the truth. It will prevail.

Take a look at how NCERT is throwing mud on सनातन धर्म 

HINDU WOMEN DISTRIBUTED AMONG MUSLIMS

Civilization is not inherited; it has to be learned and earned by each generation anew; if the transmission should be interrupted for one century, civilization would die, and we should be savages again.

        - Will Durant, "The Lessons of History"

How true !!

The institutions dishing out history to our nation, like NCERT and ICHR, have been interrupting this transmission for about 65 years because they actually want the oldest civilization on our planet to die.

 The adjoining image of NCERT book for class 12 has been cunningly titled. The sleigh of hand can not be discerned by teenagers. Even adults would fail to notice the wickedness of the title. Women slavery has been clubbed with Sati. Sati is a practice which is clearly associated with Hinduism. To know more about it, read Sati Pratha and Christian fanatics. Behind this smoke screen, the crooks at NCERT are hiding the slavery of women which is institutionaized in Islam. Look at the last sentence in the box titled 'Slave women'. It reads:

Most female slaves were captured in raids and expeditions. 

Further down, on the same page, it states that:

It appears from Ibn Battuta’s account that there was considerable differentiation among slaves. Some female slaves in the service of the Sultan were experts in music and dance, and Ibn Battuta enjoyed their performance at the wedding of the Sultan's sister.

What these crooks are not telling is that these slaves were Hindu women who had been brutally snatched from their family and were sold to, or worse, gifted as trophies to the henchmen of the Sultan. 

Here is what Ibn Batuta tells about the slaves:

Page 238 of 'Tughlaq kalin Bharat' by S.A.A. Rizvi

At that time, some infidel women were collected as war booty and out of them ten were gifted to me. I handed over one of them to the person who had brought them to me. He was not satisfied with it. My companions took three out of those young women. I have no recollection about the rest of them. The women collected as war booty are very cheap in this country. They are filthy and not well conversant in urbane manners. Trained concubines are also very cheap here, as a result, there is no need to buy sex slaves here.

For the rascals sitting at NCERT, this will give away the tortures that the Hindu society has suffered at the hands of these bigots. Women were sold like pieces of dirt. The best way to hide the ugly face of barbaric creeds is to throw a lot of mud on the gentlest of civilizations.
The Hindu women, who were unlucky enough to fall into the hands of Islamic monsters were forced to sing and dance like prostitutes in front of the murderers of their near and dear ones. Then they were gifted to these rascals to satiate their lust. 

Is it any wonder that a large number of women preferred to die as a sati, instead of living the worst possible life.

Then there is another entry in the book of Ibn Batuta titled Eed ka darbaar. Most of the Hindus think that Islamic occasions are also some kind of festive humane celebrations. Eed is one of such Islamic occasions. This is exactly what NCERT wants us to believe. Well, let us take a look at the proceedings of this 'holy' day.

ईद का दरबार 

Page 188 of 'Tughlaq kalin Bharat' by S.A.A. Rizvi

It explains that when Sultan takes his seat on this 'pious' day, the daughters of Hindu Kings, which have been captured during the year are forced to sing and dance in front of Muslims. Then they are handed over to foreigners and fighters. Then other Hindu women are made to dance after which they are handed over to the brohters, relatives and sons of the commanders. This deed is performed by the Sultan after his Namaaz at dawn. Next day again, the same routine is followed after the Namaaz of dawn. This time the women are gifted to the chief Slaves of the Sultan.

Most of the Hindu population does not know that Namaz is not something like a शांति पाठ  of Hindus. It is quite the opposite. They are praying for the decimation of Infidels.

This illusion  has been achieved by controlling the sources of mass information. NCERT is just one of them.

The survival of our civilization depends on passing on the correct and true history to the next generations. 

Otherwise barbarity will win.

SATI PRATHA AND CHRISTIAN FANATICS

One of the favorite sticks with which सनातन धर्म is attacked is Sati Pratha. The moment any Hindu talks about the elevated position given to women in सनातन धर्म, the opponents say that सति प्रथा  is the biggest blot on women and Sanatan Dharm is responsible for this heinous crime against women. NCERT has taken it to an all new level. The result is that Hindus become apologetic and run for cover. 

The word प्रथा indicates a tradition. The vast corpus of Hindu literature has stray references of Sati but most of the women used to live normally. The example of Kunti and Madri is the best one for this. Madri chose to die with her husband and Kunti decided to live. The mothers of मर्यादा पुरुषोत्तम राम namely कौशल्या, सुमित्रा & कैकयी did not commit suicide at the death of their husband. The highest authority of सनातन धर्म, i.e. the Vedic literature does not talk of Sati. Rather it talks of widow remarriage and also नियोग, in which a woman and her family chose a respectable man to father the children of childless widow. That is how धृतराष्ट्र & पांडू were born to the widows of the son of Satyavati in Mahabharat.  

Unlike the predatory religions which consider one book to be sufficient for all the aspects of human life, सनातन धर्म keeps on evolving. That is what gave rise to सती प्रथा & जौहर प्रथा। When barbaric invaders started violating our holy land, Hindu women had three choices at the death of their husbands: 

1. They could live to be captured and raped by the killers of their husbands and other relatives
2. They could live and be sold into slave markets created in the Islamic world
3. They could chose death

Not surprisingly, majority of them chose the third option. For nearly thousand years, starting with 715 AD (when Muhammad bin Qasim gained first victory on our motherland), Hindus, especially women, lived a horrid life. For details of Slavery as an Islamic institution, read the origins of Muslim slave system in India by K.S.Lal.

Any honest and patriotic historian will tell these facts to the students of the nation when talking about Sati. The operative words are - honest and patriotic.

The adjoining text is on page 135 of History textbook of class 12. 

From many instances of Sati witnessed by 'Fancois Bernier', this one has been specially hand picked. It has been taken up for two reasons. It creates an impression that Hindu religion is bad and portrays Brahmans in poor light. So this insertion serves two purposes of missionaries at the same time.

The other references of Sati, as mentioned by Bernier, talk of Hindu widows participating in the act willingly. They have not been mentioned by NCERT because that will give the reader a hint as to the conditions of such extra ordinary measures. There are numerous instances when Hindu women immolated themselves so that they do not fall into the wretched hands of Muslim gangsters. The earliest reference can be found out when Muhammad bin Qasim was on verge of gaining the first victory for Islam on our holy land. The immortal words of Raja Jaisingh's wife tell the whole story:

Jaisiya is separated from us and Mohammad Kasim has come. God forbid that we should owe our liberty to these outcast cow eaters (म्लेच्छ गोमांस भक्षक)! Our honor would be lost. Our respite is at end, and there is no hope of any escape.; let us collect wood, cotton and oil, for I think we should burn ourselves and go to meet our husbands. If any wish to save herself, she may.

History of India as told by its own historians, Vol. 1 pp 152

In one of such incidents, Bernier was himself asked to talk to a widow who wanted to end her life. What transpired there can be read from his memoirs. Read it yourself:

There is one more description of a Sati on pp 309:

I ran at once to the spot, and going to the edge of a large and nearly dry reservoir, observed at the bottom a deep pit filled with wood : the body of a dead man extended thereon; a woman seated upon the same pile; four or five Brahmens setting fire to it in every part ; five middle-aged women, tolerably well dressed, holding one another by the hand; singing and dancing round the p i t ; and a great number of spectators of both sexes. The pile, whereon large quantities of butter and oil had been thrown, was soon enveloped in flames, and I saw the fire catch t h e woman's garments, which were impregnated with scented oil, mixed with sandalwood powder and saffron; but I could not perceive the slightest indication of pain or even uneasiness in the victim,

Now let us pay a little attention to the character of the author named Francois Bernier. Try to imagine a history textbook in America explaining the views of Muhammad Atta about American society. The mere thought sounds laughable. That is what is being done by NCERT. If someone thinks the analogy is stretching it too far, then read about the bigotry of Francois Bernier in his own words. 

The Beths (Veds) render it obligatory upon every Gentile to say his prayers with his face turned to the East thrice in the twenty-four hours........Sometimes I objected to their religion that it contained a law which it would not be possible to observe in cold climates during the winter season, which was, in my mind, a clear proof that it possessed no divine original, but was merely a system of human invention. Their answer was amusing enough.

To an average reader, this question by Bernier may sound stupid or childish but then he was trapped in the prison house of Christian doctirnes as we will see. The Brahman replied in the typical accommodating nature of Hinduism.

'We pretend not,' they replied, ' that our law is of universal application. God intended it only for us, and this is the reason why we cannot receive a foreigner into our religion. We do not even say that yours is a false religion : it may be adapted to your wants and circumstances, God having, no doubt, appointed many different ways of going to heaven.' 

The answer is what any Hindu can give even today. It is what Bernier records next will give the reader an insight into Bernier's mind. He writes:

I found it impossible to convince them that the Christian faith was designed for the whole earth, and theirs was mere fable and gross fabrication.

Replace 'Christian faith' with Islam and that is what Muhammad Atta or Osama Bin Laden would have said about christianity.

HINDU BECOMES डाकू & लुटेरे

In one of the earlier posts, it was seen that the brave Hindus, who were fighting the Islamic marauders have been termed as 'Chieftains' and सरदार by Congress led NCERT. If that is a shameful act, then think again. These brave men and women have been termed as डाकू & लुटेरे a little down the book.

NCERT HISTORY BOOK for 12 class. page - 120

Let us look at the actual words used by Ibn Batuta himself. 

तुग़लक कालीन भारत पृष्ठ 170
लेखक - सैयद अतहर अब्बास रिज़वी 

He is talking about the time when what is now called Pakistan (what a misnomer!) had not been torn apart from our motherland. It was inhabited by proud काफिर लोग। They have been divided into two distinct categories by the rapist Ibn Batuta. One were the brave hearts who kept on fighting the barbaric creed and the others were called ज़िम्मी. 

Notice the word ज़िम्मी. It refers to those who are not Muslims and they pay a हफ़्ता called जिज़िया  so that the Islamic goons do not kill them. Muhammad, the Godman of Islam, had coined this term and it was applied for the first time to the Jews of Khaibar. He picked up a beautiful girl of the tribe and inducted her into his Harem and let the others of his tribe live so that they would produce food for Muhammad and his friends. The Zimmis served a purpose for Islamic state. They were allowed to just survive and the state took their resources. Thus state lived like a parasite on the Zimmis. 

Like everything else, the concept of Zimmi and Jizya also comes from the Godman Muhammad. Whenever he had to legitimize something, it was said to be a divine message and therefore is a part of Quran. It was designed to humiliate the non Muslims, as can be seen from the verse of 'Holy' Quran itself:

अहले किताब में से जो लोग न तो (दिल से) ख़ुदा ही पर ईमान रखते हैं और न रोज़े आख़िरत पर और न ख़ुदा और उसके रसूल की हराम की हुई चीज़ों को हराम समझते हैं और न सच्चे दीन ही को एख्तियार करते हैं उन लोगों से लड़े जाओ यहाँ तक कि वह लोग ज़लील होकर (अपने) हाथ से जज़िया दे

Verse 29, Chapter 9

All the present day Muslims in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh belong to the bloodline of these poor Hindus who must have had compulsions to tolerate the ज़लील conditions imposed on them by the foreigners. That is why the educated ones among them are trying to embrace their Hindu heritage by discarding the imposed creed on them. 

Had these 'highway robbers' not been there, we also would have been converted to a creed which has no respect for women, nature, humanity and above all meritocracy which is inherent in सनातन धर्म. We would have been brainwashed to feel proud of serial rapists and mass murderers.

The brave hearts with a 'never say die' approach should have been eulogized as the saviours of our nation and धर्म instead of being maligned as robbers or bandits. That will happen when the Hindu society will shed its present तामसिक स्थिति and stand up to intellectual atrocities being perpetrated upon them. 

RAPISTS ARE विद्वान: NCERT

What would a normal human think of a king who distributes helpless women, who have been captured during a war, to his accomplices?

A Monster??

But if we go by NCERT, such a rascal should be called a विद्वान।

page 118 of text book for 12 class

Look at the choice of words - दयाशील संरक्षक । These words have been used for dual purpose. They establish the Sultan Muhammad bin Tughlaq as दयाशील and the visitor Ibn Batuta as a विद्वान as the Sultan is impressed by his विद्वत्ता |

Both of these are men were just the opposite of this, as we will see.

Since most of the readers of these text books are Hindus (83%, claims of missionaries to the contrary notwithstanding), who think that a विद्वान is generally a साधू महात्मा or a ऋषि who believes in अहिंसा and वसुधैव कुटुम्बकम, it is the perfect word to fool them into believing that विद्वान of other creeds are also so harmless. Let us look at what this 'विद्वान' and his दयाशील patron did to our ancestors, about seven centuries ago.

Below is a part of page 290 from the book 'Tughlaq Kalin Bharat', translated by Syed Athar Abbas Rizvi. The title is 

घज़्व धर्म युद्ध हेतु हमारा प्रस्थान तथा संदापुर की विजय 

The word Ghazwah means a plundering expedition and its root word is Ghazi. A Ghazi is one who depends on his livelihood by brigandage. धर्म युद्ध means Jihad of Islam.  It has nothing to do with धर्म because Islam is not a धर्म but a religion. The विद्वान of Quran are supposed to be Jihadi and plunder infidels because that is what Muhammad (the Godman of Islam used to do).

Read अल्लाह instead of इश्वर for the right perspective 

What it tells us is that this विद्वान fought the काफिर Hindus and then was awarded a woman from the prisoners of war. The lecher did not return her to her husband even after pleading and being offered money. Try to visualize the agony of the poor lady who was raped by this monster. And he has been turned into a विद्वान by his like minded friends at NCERT. 

The विद्वान of Quran are supposed to be Jihadi and plunder infidels because that is what Muhammad (the Godman of Islam used to do). The verse 41 of chapter 8 says it clearly.

Some of you might think that the woman taken as slave by Ibn Batuta might have been taken for some harmless domestic chores like washing and ironing the clothes of this विद्वान. To understand the kind of activity such poor women had to perform, there is another entry in the diary of Ibn Batuta, the NCERT विद्वान |

The title is 'Death of my daughter and her funeral rites'.

He is telling us about the death of her infant daughter.  Nothing surprising here. 

The typical mentality gets reflected in the description that he gives us of the mother of his daughter.

Since he was on the payrolls of Sultan, the mother of Sultan sent a पालकी to his house. Now, read the extract below, from the next page:

That is the kind of persons who are considered विद्वान by NCERT under Italian Mafia.

And how does this विद्वान describe the दयाशील Sultan.

The english translation mentioned in 'History of India told by its own historians 2' by Elliot and Dowson says the same thing:

Muhammad is a man who, above all others, is fond of making presents and shedding blood. There may always be seen at his gate some poor person becoming rich, or some living one condemned to death. His generous and brave actions, and his cruel and violent deeds, have obtained notoriety among the people.

So much so for दयाशील Sultan.

The era when Ibn Batuta visited India, that was the most difficult time for Hindus. They were being killed in thousands by Islamic invaders and their women and children were being sold as slaves and sex slaves. The ease with which Ibn Batuta talks about Hindu women being sold dirt cheap can be sensed from his accounts. Here is one of them (pp 238)

If you are wondering about the reason of this perversion by NCERT, you have to understand three ideologies which have sprung up from Bible: Christianity, Islam and Communism. And read some good book on applied psychology. 

And you have to know that NCERT has been in the grip of persons belonging to these persuasions.